|
HUNTSVILLE, Ala., Aug. 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Riki
Ellison, president and founder of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance
(MDAA) (www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org)
was in Alabama this week and had the opportunity to reflect on and analyze
the views of the U.S. missile defense community as they gathered in
Huntsville, Alabama.
This week in Huntsville, Alabama was a gathering of the
highest ranking U.S. military generals who directly oversee missile defense
with the U.S. industrial base that develop and produce all the missile
defense systems for the U.S. military. This conference enabled proactive
communication of expectations and explanations of the current
Administration's positioning on Missile Defense and a strategic vision
different than the previous Administration that the U.S. military projects
to implement.
General James E. "Hoss" Cartwright, Vice
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, advocated passionately for the
elimination of nuclear weapons against emerging proliferating nations and
for U.S. extended deterrence to work for the next 50 years a non-nuclear
offense and a missile defense that must be able to devalue and deter these
nations. General Cartwright further brought up in this context the
relevance and irrelevance of current and future systems. This position by
General Cartwright correlates with President Obama's desire to reduce
nuclear weapons as well as support regional missile defenses.
The biggest departure of strategy from the previous
Administration is the omission in this conference of any discussion of the
third missile defense site in Poland and the Czech Republic. A strong case
was made by General Kevin P. Chilton, U.S. Strategic Command commander,
that strategic stability between the U.S. and Russia and the U.S. and China
are the top priority for the command and have to prevent incentives to be
unstable. In China's case who feel strategically stable with the U.S., that
they don't develop and deploy more strategic nuclear missiles. Thereby
stating who the U.S. missile defense capability is aimed at and not aimed
at, clearly defining that it is not aimed at Russia or China. Furthermore,
General Chilton presented Russia's strategic sensitivities to the third
site in Poland moving in a direction away from deployment there.
One alternative solution that was referenced in many of
the discussions as well as presented by Lt General Patrick O'Reilly,
director of the Missile Defense Agency, is the concept of land-basing the
SM3 and Aegis sea-based missile defense system and integrating it with
current missile defense sensors and with new sensors such as remote UAVs,
and space-based sensors such as the STSS (Space Tracking Surveillance
System). This would enable the system if placed in geographic desired
locations and with further development to engage to intercept in the early
ascent phase of a threatening ballistic missile thereby expanding the
defended area considerably. This solution uses the commonality of the Aegis
SM3 system that NATO and other European nations have incorporated and the
testing history success of a proven system which aligns with the
administration's position on missile defense. The land-based SM3 could
alleviate some of Russia's concern on the third site due to range and
placement of those sites. The system would first be placed in Israel and
additional land-based SM3s will likely be placed in Turkey or the Balkan
nations if an international agreement could be attained. The placement in
Turkey and the Balkans could potentially have the ability to protect the
U.S. homeland on early ascent intercepts of ballistic missiles from Iran.
An additional and new solution pursued and presented by
the industrial complex this week was a mobilized, two-stage, ground-based
missile interceptor designed for the third site in Poland so it can be
placed where and when needed, not just restricted to the European region.
The issues of concern of both of these proposed
solutions is the reality of the political loss and the international
consequences of the U.S. withdrawing its commitment and bilateral
agreements with Poland and the Czech Republic. The ramifications to those
countries, Europe, NATO and Russia are significant and long lasting. Also
of major concern is the capability to have "high" confidence in
protecting the eastern United States seaboard particularly the southeast
from long-range ballistic missiles from Iran. This capability of a look
shoot look shoot confidence is not available from the current deployed GBIs
in Alaska or California. Thus a system must be developed and deployed for
the adequate and equal protection of the U.S. homeland. Basing this
national security priority on proposed systems and interceptors that are on
paper rather than in the ground, unsecured international agreements as well
as intelligence projecting that Iran won't have a nuclear and ICBM
capability by 2015 is accepting high risk for our nation's homeland and
American public safety.
On another important note, the international cooperation
with the United States on missile defense has grown to 30 countries as
announced by Lt General O'Reilly, director of the Missile Defense Agency.
Within the next six months three major reports will come
forward for the Administration that will solidify the statements that were
reflected this week and they include the Ballistic Missile Defense Posture
Review, the Space Posture Review and the Quadrennial Defense Review.
As General Chilton stated "...a good defense
requires a great offense." We at MDAA would say a great offense
requires a good defense!
.
|