WASHINGTON, April 6, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
-- Riki Ellison, Chairman and Founder of the Missile Defense Advocacy
Alliance (MDAA), www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org,
has released a statement on the House Armed Forces Committee hearing on
the FY2012 missile defense budget and the lack of projected cost for
U.S. missile defense plans in Europe. Ellison is one of the top lay
experts in the field of missile defense in the country. His comments
follow below:
"The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic
Forces recently held a hearing on the authorization for FY2012 missile
defense funding with Chairman Representative Michael Turner (R, OH-3)
and the Ranking Member Representative Loretta Sanchez (D, CA-47).
Representatives Turner and Sanchez opened the testimony with remarks on
the status of missile defense and voiced their concerns about our
nation's homeland missile defense system.
"This was followed by
concerns about the confidence in the Phase Adaptive Approach (PAA), the
plan to protect Europe from Iran, and its development schedule of the
Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA and IIB missiles. The hedge strategy
if the PAA schedule is delayed or Iran develops a missile threat
earlier than expected was also of concern. The questioning wrapped up
with a strong push for Directed Energy and the Airborne Laser Test Bed
(ALTB) flight experiments for boost-phase missile defense.
"At its
conclusion the hearing brought up the reality of the technical
challenges remaining for the PAA to stay on schedule. This included the
capability for all of its missile defense systems to demonstrate
successful discrimination against missile countermeasures and to launch
interceptors and engage missiles remotely; relying and being dependent
on sensors separate from the platform the interceptors are launched
from.
"Noticeably missing from the testimony were the funding
requirements for Aegis Ashore; including its full outlay of manpower,
missiles, S-band radars, fire control, production and force protection
needs. Aegis Ashore is the cornerstone platform for the defense of
Europe that will be developed, tested and deployed in Hawaii (2013),
Poland (2015) and Romania (2018).
"More importantly, the total
cost to the American tax payers for the full implementation of the Aegis
Ashore System, additional Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) ships
and missiles, forward based AN/TPY-2 radars, future sensors, additional
force protection and Command and Control integration for the protection
of Europe has not been announced, nor was it addressed. Absent from the
hearing was a discussion about the authorization of additional funding
to cover these costs that are instrumental in the full implementation of
the President's plan to protect Europe. This unidentified cost could be
approximately $4-8 billion and will have to compete for funding with
the United States combat commanders missile defense demands for their
areas of responsibility in the U.S., Middle East, East Asia, Israel and
Northern Africa.
"Further adding to the complexity of a
challenging program and an underfunded missile defense budget is the use
of continuing resolutions (CR) to fund the Federal Government. The use
of CRs has kept spending at FY2010 levels for the past six months and
has held back all authorized program spending for 2011. This has
resulted in work shortages, program delays and the severe limitation of
systems like the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD). The GMD and other
systems have had to make cuts to their current and future capability
severely damaging their ability to stay on schedule and budget."