|
Riki Ellison, Chairman and Founder of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance (MDAA),
www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org,
has released a statement today regarding the recent announcement by the
president of Romania about being interested in starting negotiations to
host a U.S. missile defense system. Riki Ellison is one of the top lay
experts in the field of missile defense in the world. Ellison's
comments are below:
The President of Romania, Mr. Traian Basescu, announced his
willingness to negotiate terms with the United States to host a U.S.
Land-based Aegis Ashore Missile Defense system last week. Basescu
stated that the proposed system could be in place by 2015. The formal
invitation for cooperation came directly from President Barack Obama
and was initiated by Vice President Joe Biden's visit to Romania in
October 2009. The potential addition of another international partner
in missile defense is a welcome movement towards a global missile
defense community. There are now 40 countries participating, including
Romania, with the United States on missile defense.
This Romanian proposal does have serious challenges, both
politically and technically, to be a sound investment of United States
tax dollars and in its alignment with the President's Missile Defense
plan.
The President's Plan calls for sea- and land-based Missile Defense
assets to collectively protect Europe in a phased adaptive approach
that could cost of upwards of $9 Billion or more. Financial
participation by NATO and European countries towards this plan that
protects Europe from Iran is non-existent. Under the previous
Administration's plans, short- and medium-range ballistic missile
defense of Europe had financial contributions from NATO members. The
United States was supporting those efforts and focused on solely
financing the proposed long-range ballistic missile protection in
Poland and the Czech Republic which would have protected the U.S.
Homeland and Northern Europe. It would be a mistake not to have
European participation in financing the President's plan and to rely
completely on US tax dollars from the American Public on a system that
protects Europe but not the United States.
Placing the proposed capability by 2015 in Romania with the current
sea -based defensive missiles (SM3 Block 1A) and a future proposed (SM3
Block 1B) which has yet to be tested, can only technically provide
fixed protection of a few nearby countries from an Iranian ballistic
missile threat. Iran's intermediate-range missile system currently in
development, the Shahab-3 (with a 1200 mile range), will severely
challenge the system in Romania as projected. This is due to the narrow
defended area that its capability can provide. Requirements for the
proposed site in Romania and the Land -based Aegis Ashore system have
not been set. More importantly the entire test platform that will be
required to prove out the system and prior to deployment in Romania has
not begun construction; it is designated to be built at the Pacific
Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii.
Sensitive issues will remain with the Romanian Proposal as future
adoption and integration of remote sensors coupled with the future
capabilities of faster and more adept interceptors could lead to a much
more enhanced site. This could lead to a system with the potential to
have more capability than the canceled site in Poland or the current
capabilities our country now has in place. Because of time and
development this would most likely be a decision made by the next
Administration.
Romania as well as the United States will have to question the
proposal thoroughly or Romania will be jilted at the altar to the
appeasement of Russia; alongside former suitors, Poland and the Czech
Republic.
Riki Ellison is available for on the record interviews. Contact Barbara Maxwell at 703-299-0060 to schedule.
SOURCE Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance
|