Search:
ADVOCACY
Calendar
Contributions
Events
Event Photos
Legislative Contacts
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
Legislative Research
Budget Documentation
Membership
Memorials
Ronald Reagan Vandenberg Memorial
Kauai Veteran's Eternal Memorial and Missile Defense Viewing Site
MD History
MD Watch Newsletter
MDAA Policy Papers
Defender of the Month
PROLIFERATION
Ballistic Missile Basics
Ballistic Missiles Classes and Range
Missile Components
Proliferation Map
Threat Map
Threats
PROTECTION
US Missile Defense Systems
Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System
Standard Missile-2 (SM-2)
Standard Missile-3 (SM-3)
Airborne Laser (ABL)
Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD)
Ground Based Interceptor (GBI)
Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV)
Kinetic Energy Interceptor (KEI)
Network Centric Airborne Defense Element (NCADE)
Patriot Missile Air Defence System
Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3)
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
System Components
Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV)
US Sensor Systems
Aegis Radar System (SPY-1 Radar)
Forward-Based X-Band Radar
Sea Based X-Band Radar
Sensor Sites
Ground Based Early Warning Radar at Thule Air Base
Ground Based Early Warning Radar at Flyingdales
Ground Based Early Warning Radar at Beale Air Base
Ground Based Early Warning Radar Cobra Dane
MD Programs
Defense Support Program (DSP)
Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS)
Real Capability
Non - U.S. Systems
Israel
AN/TPY-2 Forward X-Band Radar
Ground Based Interceptor Arrow-2
Ground Based Patriot-2 (PAC-2)
David's Sling
Iron Dome
Japan
AN/TPY-2 Forward X-Band Radar
Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3)
Sea Based Aegis/Standard Missile-2 (SM-2)
Sea Based Aegis/Standard Missile-3 (SM-3)
Russia
A-135 Anti-Ballistic Missile System
International Cooperation
NATO
Australia
Czech Republic
Denmark
France
Germany
India
Israel
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
Poland
Republic of Korea
Romania
Russia
Spain
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
TESTING
System Testing
Air-Based
Airborne Laser (ABL)
Net-Centric Airborne Defense Element (NCADE)
Ground-Based
Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD)
Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3)
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
Sea-Based
Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense/SM-2
Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense/SM-3
International Testing
Dutch
Israel
Japan
Testing Information
Ground-Based Midcourse Defense
Net-Centric Airborne Defense Element (NCADE)
Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3)
Sea-Based Aegis/SM-2
Sea Based Aegis/SM-3
November 1, 2008 - 11th Successful-Sea Based Intercept
December 17, 2007 - 10th Successful Sea-Based Intercept Test
November 6, 2007 - 8th and 9th Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Tests
June 22, 2007 - 6th Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
April 26, 2007 - 5th Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
December 7, 2006 - An Unsuccessful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
June 22, 2006 - 4th Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
November 17, 2005 - 3rd Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
February 24, 2005 - 2nd Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
December 11, 2003 - 1st Successful Sea-Based Interceptor Test
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
March 19, 2009 - 6th Successful Theatre High Altitude Area Defense Intercept
June 25, 2008 - 5th Successful Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Test
October 27, 2007 - 4th Successful Terminal Hight Altitude Area Defense Test
April 6, 2007 - 3rd Successful Terminal High Altitude Area Defense System Test
January 26, 2007 - 2nd Successful Theatre High Altitude Area Defense Test
July 12, 2006 - 1st Successful Theatre High Altitude Area Defense Test
International Testing
December 17, 2007 - 1st Successful Japanese Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Test
PUBLIC SURVEYS
MEDIA RESOURCES
MDAA
Alerts
Letters to the Editor
Press Releases
Quotes
Site Tours
Speeches
Testing Visits
Headlines
Opinions and Editorials
Blogs
Multimedia
Image Gallery
Video Gallery
Request an Interview
BLOG
ABOUT
Board of Directors
Mr. David S. Bracken, Esq
Mr. Riki Ellison
Mr. Donald Simpson
Mr. Hatim Tyabji
Advisory Board
Lt. General Larry Dodgen
Ambassador Robert Joseph
Lt. General Ronald Kadish
General Lester Lyles
Lt. General Henry A. Obering
Mr. John Rood
Mr. Hatim Tyabji
Chairman and Founder
Contact Us
Missile Defense In The News
Back To news Listing
11/23/2009 - Defending the Holy Land
Dear Members and Friends,
During the early part of this month, 1,400 soldiers and personnel from the U.S. European Combat Command and 1,400 Israeli soldiers from the Israel Defense Force deployed in Israel with the most current missile defense weapon platforms successfully exercised a joint integrated forces mission to defend Israel from the current and future threats of Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. This was the largest missile defense force ever assembled between the two countries to perform a missile defense exercise. The missile defense systems and architecture deployed in this mission by the United States represented the current missile defense architecture for Europe. The interoperability between the Israel missile defense systems and those of the United States acting as one cohesive unit both tactically and strategically was the main objective of the mission. The firing solutions of these missile defense systems to adequately protect and defend Israel present significant challenges as Israeli soldiers cannot authorize the use and fire of U.S. systems and vice-versa. These challenges along with operational readiness and war fighter proficiency were successfully demonstrated, leaving Israel and the United States the most confident they have ever been in their joint ability to protect and defend Israel from a missile attack.
As Iran demonstrated yesterday with their publicly announced war exercises against Israel, this U.S./Israeli joint exercise comes at a pivotal time in the Middle East when Iran has backed off President Obama and his administration's request on exporting enrichment of uranium to the U.S. or France and when Israeli Special forces recently intercepted the ship "Francop" suspected of carrying Russian missile parts for the Russian S-300s a surface-to-air missile and air defense system. Iran has purchased the S-300s from Russia for most likely air defense of their nuclear sites housing centrifuges and missile fields from the Israeli Air Force.
Having demonstrated confidence in a large interoperable missile defense force that combines U.S. and Israeli intercept missiles, sensors, systems and soldiers provides immense security and stability to the region and its inhabitants to include the populations and deployed forces located there. This allows the diplomatic inroads, international sanctions and pressure to continue to bear on Iran without fear or credibility of a military missile strike. This substantial missile defense demonstration also brings forth considerable messages to Iran on investment into missile systems. However, Israel can also look at this demonstration as giving the Israeli public more confidence they can withstand a Iranian missile strike and may choose to be the aggressor if U.S. diplomacy fails and before Iran has enrichment capability and deployment of Russian S-300s are in place defending those nuclear centrifuge sites or missile fields.
The U.S. Missile Defense Systems used in the mission included the a U.S. Aegis Missile Defense capable ship in the port of Haifa, a THAAD Battery, a AN/TPY-2 Forward-based X-Band Radar, two Patriot 3 batteries and the battle management C2BMC out of EUCOM in Germany.
The Israeli missile defense systems used in the mission included Israeli purchased Patriot 2 batteries, the Israeli Arrow 2 block 4 missile defense system including the Green Pine and Super Green Pine radars with their fire control systems and yet to be deployed Israel/US joint David Sling, a ground-based air-to-air missile defense system for short-range missiles and rockets.
The United States Government with Congressional and Presidential approval continues to fund Israel missile defense requests as 2010 budget request will provide around $200 million to Israel for missile defense.
We at MDAA strongly support continued joint missile defense exercises and the protection of Israel, a Holy Land for many people around the world, for if conflict of magnitude is to occur, this region is the most likely in our world to use missile defense to defend and protect human life. Unlike anywhere else in the world Israel has and continues to be under consistent rocket and missile attack, they have a duty to protect their citizens and country. The United States has the responsibility to protect its friends and allies from harm.
Respectfully,
Riki Ellison